The European Union has expressed concern regarding Hong Kong’s new passed national security bill, warning that it could have a significant impact on the functioning of the EU’s office in the region and on Hong Kong’s status as a business hub.
This new legislation, known as Article 23, encompasses a wide range of offenses such as treason, sabotage, sedition, and espionage, carrying sentences ranging from several years to life imprisonment.
Despite criticism from various quarters, including the United Nations, the bill was swiftly passed by Hong Kong lawmakers, with Chief Executive John Lee announcing its imminent implementation.
The EU, echoing the sentiments of the UN, raised questions about the potential infringement on the rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong, as well as its implications for the city’s attractiveness as a global business center. The rushed legislative process and the vague provisions of the bill were particularly alarming to international observers, with concerns raised about its compatibility with international human rights standards.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights criticized the accelerated passage of the law without thorough deliberation and consultation, labeling it a setback for human rights protection in Hong Kong.
The United Kingdom also weighed in, expressing worries about the impact of the law on Hong Kong’s reputation as a city that upholds the rule of law and protects citizens’ freedoms.
Similarly, the United States voiced alarm over the broad and vaguely defined provisions of the legislation. Amnesty International described the law as draconian, while China defended it as necessary for maintaining prosperity and stability in Hong Kong and safeguarding the interests of overseas investors.
Amidst international criticism, Beijing accused the UK of hypocrisy and double standards, citing its own national security laws. China urged the UK to abandon its colonial mindset and accept the reality of Hong Kong’s situation. In contrast, China’s State Council Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office portrayed the law as essential for Hong Kong’s well-being, democracy, and freedom, as well as for protecting the interests of overseas investors.
