In the wake of the deadly terror attack at Sydney’s Bondi Beach earlier this month, the New South Wales (NSW) Parliament has passed a broad and contentious package of legislative reforms aimed at tightening gun controls, expanding police powers over public demonstrations, and improving the national response to hate crimes. The omnibus Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill was approved after marathon debates in the state’s upper house and is now taking effect as authorities seek to respond to heightened concerns over public safety and extremist violence.
The legislative package, passed early on Wednesday after intense deliberations, introduces some of the strictest gun control measures in the country. Under the new rules, limits are placed on the number of firearms an individual may legally own — a cap that proponents say will reduce the risk of future attacks like the one on Bondi Beach. The reforms also include provisions to prevent individuals investigated for terrorism-related activity, or those residing with such individuals, from obtaining gun licences. Opposition voices and civil liberties advocates, however, have criticised the breadth and speed of the changes, arguing they could infringe on personal freedoms and were rushed through without sufficient public consultation.
Another highly controversial element of the bill grants law enforcement new authority to restrict or ban public protests for up to three months following a designated terrorist event. Premier Chris Minns defended these powers as necessary to protect communities during periods of heightened tension and to prevent inflammatory actions from escalating into violence. Critics, including activist groups and legal experts, warn that such protest bans risk undermining fundamental democratic rights, particularly free speech and assembly, and could be subject to judicial challenge on constitutional grounds.
Alongside the state-level reforms, the federal government has launched the National Hate Crimes and Incidents Database, a centralised register intended to track individuals charged under hate crime legislation across all Australian jurisdictions. Announced on Christmas Eve, the database will be maintained by the Australian Institute of Criminology and is designed to improve monitoring, analysis and policy responses to hate-based offences, which officials say is a crucial step in countering racially and religiously motivated violence. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke urged Australians to report incidents and stressed the importance of accurate data in addressing hate crimes and supporting affected communities.
The broader national context has seen heightened political focus on issues of extremism and antisemitism following the Bondi attack, which targeted Jewish Australians during a Chanukah celebration and left at least 15 people dead. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced a special end-of-year honours list recognising first responders and civilians who displayed extraordinary courage during the attack, and he has backed moves to strengthen federal hate speech laws. A formal state visit to Australia by Israeli President Isaac Herzog has also been arranged for early next year, symbolising international solidarity.
Despite the bipartisan support the bill received from both the Labor government and sections of the Liberal Party, it faced opposition from the Nationals and the Shooters and Fishers Party. The Greens abstained from the final vote in the upper house. Advocates for civil liberties, legal scholars and community groups have already signaled intentions to challenge parts of the legislation, particularly the protest restrictions, in court. As the laws come into force during the festive season, NSW is also ramping up visible security measures in public spaces across Sydney to reassure residents and visitors alike.
The state and national reforms represent a significant shift in Australia’s approach to public safety and counter-terrorism policy, reflecting the shock and political urgency triggered by the Bondi Beach tragedy. Yet they also raise complex questions about balancing security with civil liberties in a democratic society.
 Parliament has passed a broad and contentious package of legislative reforms aimed at tightening gun controls,){kind=link}